Re: [VAT-NIP UE] Bede narzekal... - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news2.icm.edu.pl!news.nask.pl!polnews.pl!not-for-mail
From: "Mx My" <m...@o...pl>
Newsgroups: pl.soc.prawo.podatki
Subject: Re: [VAT-NIP UE] Bede narzekal...
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:16:45 +0200
Organization: PolNEWS - http://www.polnews.pl
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <04102309164518@polnews>
References: <claau7$rqj$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <clbrvs$7jv$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: swift.atra.com.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: swift.atra.com.pl 1098515805 10113 194.181.190.181 (23 Oct 2004 07:16:45
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: h...@p...pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Oct 2004 07:16:45 GMT
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.127.68.137
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-From: yogamail.ourhostingserver.com
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.soc.prawo.podatki:124449
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
>First of all polish law can't be in contradiction to UE directives, and UE
>directives could be applied directly.
(..)
>If polish company supply only translation services to some company abroad
>accoriding to polish law it is not abliged to have NIP UE. Moreover it is
>not allowed to have it.

No to w takim razie może podałbyś konkretny przepis _unijny_
na uzasadnienie tego stwierdzenia?

mxmy
--
============= P o l N E W S ==============
archiwum i przeszukiwanie newsów
http://www.polnews.pl