eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plPodatkiGrupypl.soc.prawo.podatkiM,I`5 Perse cution p urpose in pub licizing it; censorship in u k.* newsgr oupsM,I`5 Perse cution p urpose in pub licizing it; censorship in u k.* newsgr oups
  • Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!feed.news.interia.pl!news.nask.pl!ne
    ws.nask.org.pl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!xlned
    .com!feeder1.xlned.com!novso.com!news.alt.net
    From: f...@y...com
    Newsgroups: esp.humanidades.historia,uk.transport.london,alt.sex.fetish.latex,pl.soc.
    prawo.podatki,alt.fan.adolf-hitler
    Subject: M,I`5 Perse cution p urpose in pub licizing it; censorship in u k.* newsgr
    oups
    Followup-To: esp.humanidades.historia,uk.transport.london,alt.sex.fetish.latex,pl.soc
    .prawo.podatki,alt.fan.adolf-hitler,uk.misc
    Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:21:09 +0000 (UTC)
    Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
    Lines: 45
    Message-ID: <a...@4...com>
    Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.soc.prawo.podatki:193326
    [ ukryj nagłówki ]

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -=-=-=-=-=
    -= purpose in publicizing it;. censorship in uk.* newsgroups -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -=-=-=-=-=

    The postings to uk.misc. newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction from
    Usenet. readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to
    suppress what was being said, both. by breaking the rules of netiquette in
    their responses on. the forum, and directly by action to revoke the account
    from which the postings. were issued.

    Yet. the postings were within the normal boundaries of behaviour for
    uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators did not see justice in. the
    censorship which was effected, as the following. excerpt shows;

    :Karen. Lofstrom (l...@l...net) wrote
    :>It does seem that the. frequency and the size of his posts are
    :>approaching. net abuse. However, IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If
    :>his postmaster were to act in this. instance, it would raise troubling
    :>censorship. issues.

    The inescapable conclusion of the censorship. effected on the uk.*
    newsgroups is that the. British are intent on their wrongdoing remaining
    concealed, and therefore. seek to subvert and suppress freedom of speech,
    not only in their own country where the. media shows xenophobic bias and
    bile. against all perceived enemies within and without, but also in other
    countries which have their own. statutes to guarantee the basic human right
    of. free speech.

    It is absolutely necessary. to bring their hate campaign out into the open
    where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for. what they
    are. That is the only. way of making it impossible for the security services
    to carry it out. There. is a wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as
    demonstrated by British people and institutions over the. last few years
    belongs to the same stable as racial hatred. In. one case, two youths on a
    Tube train. made that racism explicit by referring to their victim as a
    "soft toy, not up to. British Standards". Doubtless others victimize partly
    on the basis of race (isn’t it odd that they. chose to torment someone who
    is not ethnically English?) while. expressing their abuse in terms of
    another. genetic attribute, namely mental illness. All xenophobia on a
    genetic basis is wrong, but. while racial insults are illegal, abusing the
    mentally ill is neither against the law. nor subject to similar condemnation
    when. it is exposed.

    6187

Podziel się

Poleć ten post znajomemu poleć

Wydrukuj ten post drukuj

Najnowsze wątki z tej grupy


Najnowsze wątki

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1